All country dashboards

South Sudan security dashboard

SEVEREAn attack is highly likely.Volatile without clear directionReviewed September 2026

A national settlement that has repeatedly deferred elections, subnational armed violence largely disconnected from national politics, and an oil-dependent economy exposed to the war in Sudan. Risk to staff is dominated by armed criminality, roadblocks and localised cattle and land conflict, punctuated by political crises in Juba.

Every judgement on these dashboards is an analyst reading of public reporting. Direction of travel is a judgement, not a measurement. Nothing here is live monitoring: the picture is refreshed when the desk reviews the country, and the review date is shown.

Assessed risks by severity

Analyst ratings of likelihood and impact on a five-by-five scale, scored 1–25. These are judgements from public reporting, not measured values.

  • SS-A1 Ambush or armed robbery against a road or river movementSEVERE · 16 of 25

    Likelihood Likely · Impact Major

  • SS-A2 Staff caught in communal or subnational armed violence near a field baseSEVERE · 16 of 25

    Likelihood Likely · Impact Major

  • SS-A3 Sexual violence against a staff memberSEVERE · 15 of 25

    Likelihood Possible · Impact Severe

  • SS-A4 Serious medical emergency at a location distant from adequate careSEVERE · 15 of 25

    Likelihood Possible · Impact Severe

  • SS-A5 Armed or administrative interference in selection, procurement or recruitmentSUBSTANTIAL · 12 of 25

    Likelihood Likely · Impact Moderate

Risk matrix

Where each rated risk sits once likelihood and impact are combined.

Five-by-five likelihood and impact matrix for South Sudan rated risks
Likelihood / ImpactInsignificantMinorModerateMajorSevere
Almost certain
LikelySS-A5SS-A1 SS-A2
PossibleSS-A3 SS-A4
Unlikely
Rare

Residual position: High. Controls materially reduce road and site risk, but presence in the most affected states leaves residual risk that must be accepted explicitly and reviewed each season.

What is driving the picture

Deferred political transition

Repeated extension of the transitional period keeps armed factions in a holding pattern and makes each electoral deadline a risk event.

Subnational violence

Cattle raiding, revenge cycles and youth mobilisation in Jonglei, Warrap, Unity and the Equatorias produce most of the violence that affects staff and communities.

Economic dependence on oil and Sudan's pipelines

Export disruption through Sudan drives salary arrears in the security forces, which correlates with checkpoint extortion and armed robbery.

Return and displacement pressure from Sudan

Large-scale arrivals through the northern border strain services and create friction in host areas.

Indicator watchlist

What an analyst looks for in open reporting, and why a change in it matters for people working in the country.

IndicatorWhy it matters
Announcements on the election timetable and on unification of forces.Both are trigger points for factional repositioning and for violence in Juba.
Reported roadblock, ambush and convoy incidents on the Juba–Nimule, Juba–Bor and Rumbek routes.The main determinant of overland movement viability.
Salary arrears for soldiers and police, and reporting of armed robbery in Juba.A leading indicator for opportunistic armed crime against staff and residences.
Access denials, interference and taxation of humanitarian cargo by armed actors.Signals where delivery is being taxed rather than merely delayed.

Actors that matter

  • SSPDF and allied forces

    State forces with irregular pay and uneven discipline at checkpoints.

  • SPLM-IO and other signatory factions

    Armed movements inside the transitional arrangement, with periodic local clashes.

  • Non-signatory armed groups

    Groups outside the settlement, active mainly in the Equatorias.

  • Community defence and cattle-guard groups

    Armed youth formations driving most subnational violence.

Sources and what they cannot see

  • Radio Tamazuj, Sudans Post and Eye Radio reporting
  • ACLED conflict event records for South Sudan
  • UN OCHA South Sudan and ReliefWeb reporting
  • Insecurity Insight aid-security data
  • UNMISS public reporting on protection of civilians

Rural violence is under-reported and often reaches open sources only through humanitarian reporting weeks later. Casualty figures from local sources vary widely for the same event.

Confidence: Moderate to high. South Sudan has some of the most consistent aid-security reporting in the region, though local incident detail is often thin.

Operational implications

  • Journey management with seasonal planning: pre-positioned stock before the rains, and no reliance on a single route or mode.
  • Site standards written into guarding contracts, with perimeter, lighting, access control and a rehearsed lock-down.
  • Explicit sexual-violence risk assessment and controls: accommodation arrangements, movement pairing, trained focal points, confidential reporting and survivor-centred support.
  • Medical capability mapped before deployment: first-aid trained staff on every movement, documented referral, and a named provider for escalation.
  • Community acceptance work at distribution sites, crowd-management planning, and a documented position on interference in selection and recruitment.
Full South Sudan assessment